A statistical taxonomy and another "chance" for natural frequencies (2007)
Authors
Abstract
The conclusions of Barbey & Sloman (B&S) crucially depend on evidence for different representations of statistical information. Unfortunately, a muddled distinction made among these representations calls into question the authors' conclusions. We clarify some notions of statistical representations which are often confused in the literature. These clarifications, combined with new empirical evidence, do not support a dual-process model of judgment.
Bibliographic entry
Barton, A., Mousavi, S., & Stevens, J. R. (2007). A statistical taxonomy and another "chance" for natural frequencies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 255-256. (Full text)